Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sara DiNatale results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,011 authors). This Sara DiNatale is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sara DiNatale
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Sara DiNatale (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,076
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sara DiNatale attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sara DiNatale vs sitewide
Sara DiNatale attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos