Author summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salena Zito results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 3,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,919 of 9,471 authors). This Salena Zito is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Salena Zito
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠80%Salena Zito (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,392
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos