Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These S. Renée Phillips results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Confirmation Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 647 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,426 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This S. Renée Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
S. Renée Phillips
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%S. Renée Phillips (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,426
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos