Author summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosalie Chan results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 1,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (1,268 of 9,470 authors). This Rosalie Chan is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Rosalie Chan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠87%Rosalie Chan (selected)5%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,916
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.9%12.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos