Author summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Scammell results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (3,117 of 6,949 authors). This Robert Scammell is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Robert Scammell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Franziska Wild1%
⁠56%Robert Scammell (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,456
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Robert Scammell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Robert Scammell vs sitewide
Robert Scammell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos