Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Robert L. O’Connell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 948 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,307 authors). This Robert L. O’Connell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Robert L. O’Connell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Robert L. O’Connell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 7,792
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos