Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Richard G. Frank results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 929 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,042 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This Richard G. Frank is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Richard G. Frank
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Richard G. Frank (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 9,042
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos