Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reed Lindsay results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 449 hits. Analysis detected 3,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (6,670 of 6,779 authors). This Reed Lindsay is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Reed Lindsay
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠2%Reed Lindsay (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,724
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Reed Lindsay attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Reed Lindsay vs sitewide
Reed Lindsay attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos