Author summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Pifer Parduhn results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 3,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,402 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (2,515 of 6,382 authors). This Rebecca Pifer Parduhn is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Rebecca Pifer Parduhn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠61%Rebecca Pifer Parduhn (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,402
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rebecca Pifer Parduhn attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rebecca Pifer Parduhn vs sitewide
Rebecca Pifer Parduhn attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos