Author summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ran D. Anbar M.D. results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 3,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,778 of 6,348 authors). This Ran D. Anbar M.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Ran D. Anbar M.D.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠72%Ran D. Anbar M.D. (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ran D. Anbar M.D. attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ran D. Anbar M.D. vs sitewide
Ran D. Anbar M.D. attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos