BS Summary: These Rachel Wright results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (1,781 of 4,520 authors). This Rachel Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Rachel Wright
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Sophia Gates0%
0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
1%Sergey Radchenko0%
1%Robert Lloyd0%
61%Rachel Wright (selected)4%
100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
100%Alex Horton56%
100%Zahara Hill58%
100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 2,700
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rachel Wright attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rachel Wright vs All Other Publications
Rachel Wright attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.