Author summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Ventresca results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 2,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (2,428 of 5,314 authors). This Rachel Ventresca is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Rachel Ventresca
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠55%Rachel Ventresca (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rachel Ventresca attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rachel Ventresca vs sitewide
Rachel Ventresca attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos