Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rachel M. Perera results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 420 faulty-reasoning hits from 339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,370 authors). This Rachel M. Perera is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rachel M. Perera
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Rachel M. Perera (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 339
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rachel M. Perera attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rachel M. Perera vs sitewide
Rachel M. Perera attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos