Author summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Gabel results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, False Dilemma, and Confirmation Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (7,461 of 8,418 authors). This Rachel Gabel is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Rachel Gabel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠12%Rachel Gabel (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rachel Gabel attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rachel Gabel vs sitewide
Rachel Gabel attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos