Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Rachel Denny Clow results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 2,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,020 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,568 authors). This Rachel Denny Clow is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rachel Denny Clow
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Rachel Denny Clow (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 9,020
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate