Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Barber results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 1,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,456 of 8,953 authors). This Rachel Barber is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Rachel Barber
Author details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.3% 16.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst