Author summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quinlan Forrest results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 2,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,522 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (2,082 of 6,399 authors). This Quinlan Forrest is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Quinlan Forrest
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠68%Quinlan Forrest (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,522
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Quinlan Forrest attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Quinlan Forrest vs sitewide
Quinlan Forrest attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos