Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Preston Fore results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 377 hits . Analysis detected 3,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,395 of 8,788 authors). This Preston Fore is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Preston Fore
Author details
Total words: 2,744
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst