Author summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos1,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Piper Heath results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 4,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,470 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (7,601 of 8,478 authors). This Piper Heath is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Piper Heath
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠11%Piper Heath (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,470
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Piper Heath attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Piper Heath vs sitewide
Piper Heath attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos