Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Sitter results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 548 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (3,646 of 8,337 authors). This Phillip Sitter is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Phillip Sitter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠57%Phillip Sitter (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,180
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Phillip Sitter attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Phillip Sitter vs sitewide
Phillip Sitter attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos