Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Pantuso results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 657 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (4,438 of 8,345 authors). This Phillip Pantuso is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Phillip Pantuso
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠47%Phillip Pantuso (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Phillip Pantuso attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Phillip Pantuso vs sitewide
Phillip Pantuso attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos