Author summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Inman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 679 hits. Analysis detected 3,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,714 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,052 of 5,751 authors). This Phillip Inman is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Phillip Inman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠65%Phillip Inman (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,714
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Phillip Inman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Phillip Inman vs sitewide
Phillip Inman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos