Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Philip Rotner results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 522 hits. Analysis detected 3,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,055 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,784 authors). This Philip Rotner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Philip Rotner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Philip Rotner (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,055
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.4%25.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 16.0%16.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 9.3%9.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.2%25.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.0%13.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 25.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 16.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos