Author summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Moore results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (1,075 of 8,478 authors). This Peter Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Peter Moore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠88%Peter Moore (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Moore attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Moore vs sitewide
Peter Moore attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos