Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Peter J. Winch results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 3,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,347 authors). This Peter J. Winch is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Peter J. Winch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Peter J. Winch (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter J. Winch attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter J. Winch vs sitewide
Peter J. Winch attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos