Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Blanchard results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 469 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (5,802 of 6,752 authors). This Peter Blanchard is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Peter Blanchard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠15%Peter Blanchard (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,556
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Blanchard attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Blanchard vs sitewide
Peter Blanchard attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos