Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video2,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Monies results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 1,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (8,262 of 8,332 authors). This Paul Monies is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Paul Monies
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠1%Paul Monies (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,004
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Monies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Monies vs sitewide
Paul Monies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos