Author summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Finkelman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 5,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,713 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (2,030 of 6,058 authors). This Paul Finkelman is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Paul Finkelman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠67%Paul Finkelman (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,713
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Finkelman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Finkelman vs sitewide
Paul Finkelman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos