Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video2,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Cuno-Booth results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 3,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (5,934 of 6,772 authors). This Paul Cuno-Booth is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Paul Cuno-Booth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠13%Paul Cuno-Booth (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Cuno-Booth attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Cuno-Booth vs sitewide
Paul Cuno-Booth attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos