Author summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul A. Smith results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (8,229 of 8,418 authors). This Paul A. Smith is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Paul A. Smith
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠3%Paul A. Smith (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul A. Smith attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul A. Smith vs sitewide
Paul A. Smith attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos