Author summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Gazis results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 3,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,035 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,882 of 9,439 authors). This Olivia Gazis is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Olivia Gazis
Author details
Total words: 4,035
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst