Author summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Carville results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 402 faulty-reasoning hits from 556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (840 of 8,567 authors). This Olivia Carville is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Olivia Carville
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠91%Olivia Carville (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 556
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles556 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.3%13.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos