Author summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noble Brigham results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 2,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,671 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,245 of 5,819 authors). This Noble Brigham is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Noble Brigham
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠79%Noble Brigham (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,671
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Noble Brigham attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Noble Brigham vs sitewide
Noble Brigham attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos