Author summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos2,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Misuraca Ignaczak results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,248 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (8,233 of 8,345 authors). This Nina Misuraca Ignaczak is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Nina Misuraca Ignaczak
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠2%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,248
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nina Misuraca Ignaczak attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nina Misuraca Ignaczak vs sitewide
Nina Misuraca Ignaczak attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos