Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nina Lloyd results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 2,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,247 authors). This Nina Lloyd is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nina Lloyd
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Nina Lloyd (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,228
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nina Lloyd attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nina Lloyd vs sitewide
Nina Lloyd attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos