Author summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Hachigian results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,060 hits. Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,706 of 6,070 authors). This Nina Hachigian is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Nina Hachigian
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠56%Nina Hachigian (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nina Hachigian attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nina Hachigian vs sitewide
Nina Hachigian attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos