Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Santa Cruz for ProPublica results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 480 hits . Analysis detected 3,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,153 of 8,711 authors). This Nicole Santa Cruz for ProPublica is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Nicole Santa Cruz for ProPublica
Author details
Total words: 4,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst