Author summary
ā 60%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Ivor Martin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (2,049 of 4,936 authors). This Nicholas Ivor Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Nicholas Ivor Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 1%Joe Rennison1%
ā 59%Nicholas Ivor Martin (selected)3%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nicholas Ivor Martin attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nicholas Ivor Martin vs sitewide
Nicholas Ivor Martin attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos