Author summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas E. Stewart results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 1,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,016 of 8,965 authors). This Nicholas E. Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Nicholas E. Stewart
Author details
Total words: 3,987
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst