Author summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nic Rowan results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,566 of 9,471 authors). This Nic Rowan is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Nic Rowan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠84%Nic Rowan (selected)5%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,360
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.0%8.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos