Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Times Service results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 346 hits . Analysis detected 1,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,251 of 8,620 authors). This New York Times Service is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. New York Times Service
Author details
Total words: 1,812
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.5% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 2.9% 2.9% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst