BS Summary: These Nathaniel Rich results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 663 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,170 of 4,693 authors). This Nathaniel Rich is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Nathaniel Rich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Sophia Gates0%
0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
1%Sergey Radchenko0%
1%Robert Lloyd0%
54%Nathaniel Rich (selected)3%
100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
100%Alex Horton56%
100%Zahara Hill58%
100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 1,400
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nathaniel Rich attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nathaniel Rich vs All Other Publications
Nathaniel Rich attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.