Author summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Weber results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 961 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,501 of 5,283 authors). This Natalie Weber is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Natalie Weber
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠72%Natalie Weber (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalie Weber attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalie Weber vs sitewide
Natalie Weber attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos