Author summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video3,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalia Alamdari results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 728 hits. Analysis detected 4,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (7,278 of 7,622 authors). This Natalia Alamdari is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Natalia Alamdari
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
⁠5%Natalia Alamdari (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,528
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalia Alamdari attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalia Alamdari vs sitewide
Natalia Alamdari attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos