Author summary
ā 63%1 analyzed article/video1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natacha Polony results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 4,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 40% (4,259 of 7,011 authors). This Natacha Polony is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Natacha Polony
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Cleveland Documenters1%
ā 0%T. Christian Miller1%
ā 0%Ken Armstrong1%
ā 1%Franziska Wild1%
ā 40%Natacha Polony (selected)3%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,388
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natacha Polony attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natacha Polony vs sitewide
Natacha Polony attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos