Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Naomi LaChance results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 2,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,195 authors). This Naomi LaChance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Naomi LaChance
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Naomi LaChance (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Naomi LaChance attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Naomi LaChance vs sitewide
Naomi LaChance attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos