Author summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nadia Khomami results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (7,412 of 7,622 authors). This Nadia Khomami is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Nadia Khomami
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
⁠3%Nadia Khomami (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,532
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nadia Khomami attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nadia Khomami vs sitewide
Nadia Khomami attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos