Author summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video1,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nada Hassanein results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 3,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (4,890 of 8,355 authors). This Nada Hassanein is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Nada Hassanein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠42%Nada Hassanein (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,160
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nada Hassanein attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nada Hassanein vs sitewide
Nada Hassanein attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos