Author summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Carrillo-Casas results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 810 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,038 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (1,165 of 6,628 authors). This Monica Carrillo-Casas is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Monica Carrillo-Casas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠83%Monica Carrillo-Casas (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,038
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Monica Carrillo-Casas attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Monica Carrillo-Casas vs sitewide
Monica Carrillo-Casas attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos