Author summary
ā 77%1 analyzed article/video1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 3,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (1,856 of 6,001 authors). This MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 70%MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters (selected)4%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters vs sitewide
MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos